Cloud vs. On-Premises CCTV for Schools: Which Solution Is Right for Your District?

Every day we are being asked what is better for our district? on-prem solution or cloud base.

The purpose of this article is to highlight the main differences between a cloud-based solution and an
onpremises solution for the CCTV system currently being implemented at a school district.
A sample budget for a school is also included to illustrate how overall costs are impacted when
comparing cloud and onpremises deployments.

The systems we used to compare the two are open platform not a proprietary system which is a crucial
factor that allows the school to replace the video management system in the future and still use the
existing cameras with a different management system.

This comparison addresses the following topics:

  • Warranty, Management & Maintenance
  • Cost Model
  • Architecture, Scalability & MultiSite
  • Summary & Recommendation
  • Budget (example)

Warranty, Management & Maintenance

On Premises:

 The school’s IT team is responsible for daytoday system management, including:
 Applying OS and VMS software patches and updates
 Monitoring storage health and capacity
 Replacing failed disks and/or NVRs
 Cameras include a 5year warranty.
 Cybersecurity (hardening, patching, network security) is the responsibility of the district’s IT
department.

Cloud:

 The manufacturer manages software updates, system scaling, and core infrastructure as part of
the annual subscription.
 A centralized web console provides multisite visibility and management.
 There is a reduced burden on internal IT staff, but greater operational dependence on the
vendor.
 Cameras include a 10year warranty.

Cost Model

On Premises

 Higher upfront capital expenditure (CapEx) for:
 NVRs/servers, storage, UPS, racks, and licenses
 Extending storage retention may require server and storage upgrades.
 Lower ongoing software fees, but continuing costs for:
 Hardware refresh every 4–7 years
 Maintenance, updates, and internal IT labor

Cloud

 Lower upfront costs due to reduced onsite server and storage requirements.
 Ongoing subscription (OpEx) on a percamera or persite basis.
 Storage retention (e.g., 30/60/90 days) can be increased or decreased by adjusting
subscriptions, without additional hardware costs.

Architecture, Scalability & MultiSite
On Premises CCTV

 NVRs/VMS servers are located on site (MDF/IDF or security room).
 Video is stored primarily on local hard drives.
 Remote access typically relies on VPN or secure portforwarding.
 Adding more schools requires deploying and maintaining additional servers.

Cloud CCTV

 Cameras send video to a cloud service (sometimes via a small local gateway or recorder).
 Video is stored in the vendor’s data centers, with optional local backup if desired.
 Remote access is provided via secure web portals or mobile apps over the internet.
 The system is designed to scale: adding cameras or sites involves assigning additional licenses;
the platform scales automatically.

Which Approach Does SOC Recommend?

On Premises would be recommended if:

 Internet connectivity was limited or unreliable (this is not the case at our school district;
connectivity is strong).
 Policy or regulation required that all video be stored locally.
 The district had extensive IT/security staff capacity dedicated to managing servers, storage, and
cybersecurity.

For the school district, a cloud solution is likely the preferred option because:

 The district has good, reliable internet and sufficient upstream bandwidth.
 Cloud provides simpler, centralized remote and multisite management.

 Internal IT resources are limited and already responsible for many other systems; reducing the
need to maintain security servers and storage is a significant benefit.
 The manufacturer will continue to update the cloud platform and introduce new features
without requiring hardware refreshes by the district or additional costs.
 The extended camera warranty and reduced infrastructure burden mean that, over time, the
school district is likely to spend less on maintenance and replacement compared to a fully
onpremises solution.
 No need to replace any of the existing cameras already installed at the existing projects

BUDGET based on the actual design for actual School project